more bitcoin governance debates and popcorn
|Nov 15, 2018||Public post|
For TBI’s historical post on bitcoin cash, it’s genesis, and ethos, I recommend starting with my post from last year (almost to the day), Politics, Religion, and Bitcoin Cash.
For tonight, a post from Qiao on the upcoming Bitcoin Cash fork with ample color and commentary interjected from TBI.
The New BCH Civil War
Bitcoin Cash (BCH), which sprung from Bitcoin’s 2017 civil war, is gearing up for a battle of its own. We’ve most likely got another hard fork on our hands tomorrow.
Bitcoin SV, a fork supported by Craig Wright (the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto [TBI Note: and bona fide ass hole]), aims to restore the protocol to a version similar to his original vision when he launched Bitcoin in 2009.* BCH “Satoshi’s Vision” currently has a sizable 70%+ advantage in hash rate according to CoinDance.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin ABC, a fork supported by Bitmain CEO Jihan Wu, Roger Ver, and a seemingly much larger percentage of the BCH community has a slight edge in market price at the exchanges that are offering trades of the potentially split asset. The ABC team wants to make upgrades to support smart contract oracles and transaction re-ordering. Reasonable upgrades, maybe, but not “Satoshi’s Vision.”
At 11:30pm ET, BCHSV was at $178 to BCHABC’s $210 on Poloniex.
No need to reinvent the wheel summarizing the history of the BCH saga, and how we got to where we are today—Aaron at Bitcoin Magazine wrote an exceptional piece on the topic earlier today with everything you need to get started.
The Block also covered the current status of all major bitcoin market players, as well as an intriguing profile of the man in the middle of the fork, Calvin Ayre, owner of the largest BCH mining pool operator, Coingeek.
Read those pieces and come back if you choose.
So what should I think about before tomorrow’s festivities?
We’ve seen this movie before. Last year during the Bitcoin civil war, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) had a significant hash rate, at times even higher than that of Bitcoin’s (BTC), yet BTC had broader ecosystem support, and eventually “won” with what is now a 10x more valuable network.
Will this time play out any differently? Or will the BCH whales’ battle continue to spill over into the rest of the asset class?
[TBI Note: I mean look at this bloodbath:
Believe it or not, I find I’m not even looking at the price right now. Instead, I’m thinking about the more interesting, long-term abstract structural challenge of crypto governance. One of the most important unknowns in the asset class.
Forks are governance problems. Coordination problems. How can a decentralized network make good, fast, long-term decisions that keep the community aligned? How can global stakeholders network make decisions without splitting themselves?
I don’t have good answers. Maybe no one does. But there are three interesting debates you should mull over.
1. Governance is the killer feature vs. Minimize argument surface
One of the main theses at New York-based crypto VC firm Placeholder is that good governance allows crypto networks to quickly resolve arguments and adopt new features. “With good governance, you can have any feature you want.”
On the other hand, Elaine Ou beautifully commented on Bitcoin’s advantage when it comes to governance. “The more functions a currency has, the more things there are to argue over. Bitcoin’s uncompromising focus allows it to serve a broader user base.”
In theory, I agree with Chris and Joel. In practice, it’s extremely difficult to judge a priori how good a governance system is. One can only draw conclusions a posteriori, after many years, decades, or even centuries of empirical evidence. I’m a big fan of the thesis that a crypto network that does not require much governance, such as Bitcoin, is one that actually has good governance.
2. On-chain governance vs. off-chain governance
On-chain governance refers to the idea that a network’s blockchain nodes automatically upgrade through an on-chain decision process, e.g., votes by block producers.
Proponents of on-chain governance like that it 1) makes collective decision-making more efficient, and 2) does not require a hard fork.
Detractors like Ethereum’s Vlad Zamfir argue against on-chain governance on the grounds that it shifts the balance of power to block producers from full node operators and every day users, disenfranchising the latter. (It didn’t take long for his argument to play out publicly, in the form of alleged collusion amongst EOS block producers.)
In off-chain governance systems like Bitcoin and Ethereum, full node operators provide an important check and balance to block producers. This is how BCH ABC can have a lower hash power than BCH SV, while the market still believes it will win.
It’s a balance. Onchain governance and offchain governance simply make a tradeoff between efficient decision-making and decentralization of power. While on-chain governance doesn’t require hard forks, it also won’t be able to prevent network splits when there is a strong enough disagreement.
3. Centralized governance vs. decentralized governance
This leads to the third debate. What is the right balance between centralization and decentralization when it comes to governance? Decentralization is, after all, a spectrum, rather than a binary state.
Decentralization ensures monetary policy is harder to change, transactions are tougher to censor, assets are harder to seize. But decentralization comes with drawbacks. It’s harder to reach consensus around network upgrades.
Should everyone vote their stake? Should we elect philosopher kings? Run these protocols more like companies?
We’ll get back to you when we have an answer. What do you think?
P.S. Share. Subscribe. Spread the (rational) crypto love. Tweet at Messari for requests, feedback, comments, or questions.
News & Analyses
Messari Compression Algorithm
Content and thoughts from around the web as summarized by the Messari team.
🏛 [Analysis] Regulation in Crypto, and the Cost of Grey Areas – Katherine Wu
KWu discussed regulatory topics with Tony Sheng including:
The trifecta of retail investors complaints to their state and federal consumer protection agencies; people raising money that shouldn’t have been able to; and sensationalized ICO stories by mainstream media are likely why regulation and enforcement are all the rage today
Insufficient disclosure is a huge problem in the crypto industry. Given how new crypto is, everything is trial and error, so open communication trumps rigorous standardized reporting
Short to medium term regulatory enforcement is going to target direct issuers and intermediaries such as broker-dealers
Regulatory uncertainty is frustrating, and unfortunately for any businesses that are outside of the US, the question is “just how important are US customers?
🚨 [Analysis] Writing and publishing code alone cannot be a crime – Jerry Brito & Peter Van Valkenburgh
Coin Center argues smart contract code is a tool, and like any tool it can and will be used by good and bad people for both legal and illegal purposes. It is easy to reasonably foresee smart contracts will be used for illegal purposes, because tools are themselves purpose-agnostic. This is not unique to smart contracts and is applicable to other contracts like the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement as well. The author of the misused protocol, whether it be ISDA or Augur, is not the responsible party, unless we can find some deeper involvement in the crime than mere publication of a tool. (Messari | Source)
Quick Bits (Don't read that, I read it for you)
Choke Points (Exchange News)
⚖️ A Canadian court is taking charge of $26 million CAD claimed by crypto exchange QuadrigaCX due to a dispute over the funds’ provenance. The funds were frozen by the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) which will maintain liability for the assets until the case is resolved. (Messari | Source)
👁️ ConsenSys is looking to breathe new life into Token Foundry, which provides a platform to help bring new tokens to market. Token Foundry had been one of ConsenSys’ most prominent projects but has only successfully completed four token sales since it was launched in April. (Messari | Source)
Startup Signals (ICOs, Cryptos, and Startups)
📉 Japanese IT giant GMO reported an operating loss of about $5.6 million for its cryptocurrency mining business in the third quarter due to “a worsening external environment and increasing depreciation cost.” (Messari | Source)
👋 Bitmain co-founder Jihan Wu no longer holds influence in company board decisions after a restructuring. Wu, now a supervisor instead of a director, will no longer be able to vote on board decisions. (Messari | Source)
The Powers That Be (Legal/Reg/Policy)
Did I miss something?
Send me the link, your twitter handle and your best imitation compression algorithm write up. If I like it, I’ll include your bit next issue (with attribution).
🎧 ICYMI on the Messari podcast, Katherine breaks down the latest SEC order against EtherDelta’s founder, and what its implications are for DEX broadly (more in the Quick Bits as well). We also talk to Simon Taylor, founder of Global Digital Finance, about the importance of building a knowledge base and setting best practices for the crypto industry. (Ryan is an advisory board member, and Messari is a big supporter.) (17 min for your evening commute.)
Listen and subscribe to all of our podcasts— on Apple Podcasts here, Spotify here, and Google play here.
Some other great episodes are #12 (Erik Voorhees & Ari Paul at DevCon), #10 (Spencer Bogart on fund performance and tokenization), #9 (Tony Sheng on his writing process), #6 (Jake Chervinsky’s primer on federal & state crypto regulators), #4 (Nic Carter on data integrity in crypto), and #8 (Conversations on the ground at CryptoSprings).
We want your feedback!
We know Messari can feel like a couple different products right now, and we're working to unify our features into one overarching whole. To that end, We’ve made a Trello board to take in any and all of the feedback you have for us! Have at it 🛠
We need data engineers who want to bring transparency to crypto!
Join a fast growing team in NYC; work with crypto OGs, and former Bloomberg/Palantir engineers; & access a network that sets you up for the rest of your career. Apply here!
Hit us up in these locations:
Consensus Invest, New York, New York | November 27
Join Our Community:
If you are interested in helping us crowdsource token project details, or want to join our community to share your expertise, we’d love to have you on board! Take a second to fill out an application and we will get back to you soon.
Going forward, we’ll be capping new members at 15 each week to keep things running smoothly. If you haven’t heard back, you are probably in the queue.
Like what you read? Share it! Hate what you read? Let me know @MessariCrypto.